ID 14054
File
Authors
Lukkanawong, Niwat Department of Urology, Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital
Honda, Masashi Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University Researchers DB KAKEN
Teraoka, Shogo Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University
Iwamoto, Hideto Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University Researchers DB KAKEN
Morizane, Shuichi Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University Researchers DB KAKEN
Hikita, Katsuya Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University Researchers DB KAKEN
Takenaka, Atsushi Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University Researchers DB KAKEN
Keywords
laparoscopic surgery
pyeloplasty
robotic surgery
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Between March 2008 and May 2019, the patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Thirteen patients underwent laparoscopically, and 12 patients underwent robotic surgery. The significant difference was found in median operative time between laparoscopic group (296 minutes) and robotic group (199 minutes) (P = 0.001). The median time for drain removal in laparoscopic group was longer than robotic group (3 vs. 2 days, respectively, P = 0.029). Conclusion: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and excellent success rates in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, our experience study suggested that robotic surgery improves a total operative time, decreases drain removal time and less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic approach.
Publisher
Tottori University Medical Press
Content Type
Journal Article
Link
ISSN
05135710
EISSN
13468049
NCID
AA00892882
Journal Title
Yonago Acta Medica
Current Journal Title
Yonago Acta Medica
Volume
65
Issue
2
Start Page
126
End Page
131
Published Date
2022-05-23
Publisher-DOI
Text Version
Publisher
Rights
(C) 2022 Tottori University Medical Press.
Citation
Yonago Acta Medica. 2022, 65(2), 126-131. doi10.33160/yam.2022.05.002
Department
Faculty of Medicine/Graduate School of Medical Sciences/University Hospital
Language
English