@article{oai:repository.lib.tottori-u.ac.jp:00004362,
 author = {森本, 昌樹 and Morimoto, Masaki and 齊藤, 博昭 and Saito, Hiroaki and 村上, 裕樹 and Murakami, Yuki and 宮谷, 幸造 and Miyatani, Kozo and 高屋, 誠吾 and 黒田, 博彦 and Kuroda, Hirohiko and 松永, 知之 and Matsunaga, Tomoyuki and 福本, 陽二 and Fukumoto, Yoji and 尾崎, 知博 and Osaki, Tomohiro and 池口, 正英 and Ikeguchi, Masahide and Takaya, Seigo},
 issue = {4-5},
 journal = {米子医学雑誌, The Journal of the Yonago Medical Association},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {When nutritional supports are needed, enteral nutrition （EN） is recommended since it is more physiologic and effective compared with parental nutrition. However, the efficacy and safety of EN remains unclear for patients who had complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In the current study, 4 patients took EN and 10 patients took total parental nutrition （TPN） due to complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2012 to 2014. In the EN group, tube was placed through the nose into the small bowel using nasal endoscope and guide wire without any complications. Total calorie given in EN group was significantly higher than that in TPN group （p=0.005）. The rates of increase in serum concentration of total protein and albumin in EN group was higher than those in TPN group although there was not significant difference. Furthermore, postoperative length of hospital stay in EN group was shorter than that in TPN group without significant differences. There is no complication attributed to EN while there are three catheter-related bloodstream infection in the TPN group. Our results indicate that EN is effective and safe for patients who had complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.},
 pages = {64--68},
 title = {胃術後合併症患者における経鼻経腸栄養の有用性についての検討},
 volume = {66},
 year = {2015},
 yomi = {モリモト, マサキ and サイトウ, ヒロアキ and ムラカミ, ユウキ and ミヤタニ, コウゾウ and タカヤ, セイゴ and クロダ, ヒロヒコ and マツナガ, トモユキ and フクモト, ユウジ and オオサキ, トモヒロ and イケグチ, マサヒデ and タカヤ, セイゴ}
}