@article{oai:repository.lib.tottori-u.ac.jp:00004640,
 author = {本田, 正史 and Honda, Masashi and 岩本, 秀人 and Iwamoto, Hideto and 森實, 修一 and Morizane, Shuichi and 引田, 克弥 and Hikita, Katsuya and 武中, 篤 and Takenaka, Atsushi and Lukkanawong, Niwat and Teraoka, Shogo},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {Yonago Acta Medica, Yonago Acta Medica},
 month = {May},
 note = {Background: The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Between March 2008 and May 2019, the patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Thirteen patients underwent laparoscopically, and 12 patients underwent robotic surgery. The significant difference was found in median operative time between laparoscopic group (296 minutes) and robotic group (199 minutes) (P = 0.001). The median time for drain removal in laparoscopic group was longer than robotic group (3 vs. 2 days, respectively, P = 0.029). Conclusion: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and excellent success rates in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, our experience study suggested that robotic surgery improves a total operative time, decreases drain removal time and less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic approach.},
 pages = {126--131},
 title = {A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction},
 volume = {65},
 year = {2022},
 yomi = {ホンダ, マサシ and イワモト, ヒデト and モリザネ, シュウイチ and ヒキタ, カツヤ and タケナカ, アツシ}
}